Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Parents as Teachers
Public Health & Prevention: Home- or Family-based
Benefit-cost estimates updated May 2017.  Literature review updated April 2012.
Parents as Teachers (http://www.parentsasteachers.org/) is a home visiting program for parents and children with a main goal of having children ready to learn by the time they go to school. Parents are visited monthly by parent educators with some college education. Visits typically begin during the mother’s pregnancy and may continue until the child enters kindergarten.
BENEFIT-COST
META-ANALYSIS
CITATIONS
The estimates shown are present value, life cycle benefits and costs. All dollars are expressed in the base year chosen for this analysis (2016). The chance the benefits exceed the costs are derived from a Monte Carlo risk analysis. The details on this, as well as the economic discount rates and other relevant parameters are described in our Technical Documentation.
Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant
Benefits to:
Taxpayers $3,199 Benefits minus costs $6,638
Participants $5,977 Benefit to cost ratio $3.44
Others $954 Chance the program will produce
Indirect ($772) benefits greater than the costs 67 %
Total benefits $9,358
Net program cost ($2,720)
Benefits minus cost $6,638
1In addition to the outcomes measured in the meta-analysis table, WSIPP measures benefits and costs estimated from other outcomes associated with those reported in the evaluation literature. For example, empirical research demonstrates that high school graduation leads to reduced crime. These associated measures provide a more complete picture of the detailed costs and benefits of the program.

2“Others” includes benefits to people other than taxpayers and participants. Depending on the program, it could include reductions in crime victimization, the economic benefits from a more educated workforce, and the benefits from employer-paid health insurance.

3“Indirect benefits” includes estimates of the net changes in the value of a statistical life and net changes in the deadweight costs of taxation.
Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant
Benefits from changes to:1 Benefits to:
Taxpayers Participants Others2 Indirect3 Total
From secondary participant
Crime $371 $0 $765 $186 $1,322
Child abuse and neglect $382 $1,218 $0 $191 $1,792
K-12 grade repetition $42 $0 $0 $21 $63
K-12 special education $193 $0 $0 $96 $290
Property loss associated with alcohol abuse or dependence $0 $1 $1 $0 $1
Health care associated with PTSD $193 $63 $239 $97 $592
Labor market earnings associated with child abuse & neglect $2,204 $4,853 $0 $88 $7,144
Costs of higher education ($186) ($157) ($51) ($93) ($488)
Adjustment for deadweight cost of program $0 $0 $0 ($1,358) ($1,358)
Totals $3,199 $5,977 $954 ($772) $9,358
Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant
Annual cost Year dollars Summary
Program costs $1,450 2003 Present value of net program costs (in 2016 dollars) ($2,720)
Comparison costs $0 2003 Cost range (+ or -) 10 %
Average annual cost provided by Parents as Teachers National Center in 2003. Average length of program estimated by WSIPP, based on weighted average of treatment length reported in the original research studies. To support that analysis, WSIPP communicated with Nicole Thomson at the National Center (July 2014), who provided assistance in gathering some details not reported in the original studies (i.e., how long families typically stayed with the program).
The figures shown are estimates of the costs to implement programs in Washington. The comparison group costs reflect either no treatment or treatment as usual, depending on how effect sizes were calculated in the meta-analysis. The cost range reported above reflects potential variation or uncertainty in the cost estimate; more detail can be found in our Technical Documentation.
Estimated Cumulative Net Benefits Over Time (Non-Discounted Dollars)
The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in non-discounted dollars to simplify the “break-even” point from a budgeting perspective. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.

^WSIPP’s benefit-cost model does not monetize this outcome.

Meta-analysis is a statistical method to combine the results from separate studies on a program, policy, or topic in order to estimate its effect on an outcome. WSIPP systematically evaluates all credible evaluations we can locate on each topic. The outcomes measured are the types of program impacts that were measured in the research literature (for example, crime or educational attainment). Treatment N represents the total number of individuals or units in the treatment group across the included studies.

An effect size (ES) is a standard metric that summarizes the degree to which a program or policy affects a measured outcome. If the effect size is positive, the outcome increases. If the effect size is negative, the outcome decreases.

Adjusted effect sizes are used to calculate the benefits from our benefit cost model. WSIPP may adjust effect sizes based on methodological characteristics of the study. For example, we may adjust effect sizes when a study has a weak research design or when the program developer is involved in the research. The magnitude of these adjustments varies depending on the topic area.

WSIPP may also adjust the second ES measurement. Research shows the magnitude of some effect sizes decrease over time. For those effect sizes, we estimate outcome-based adjustments which we apply between the first time ES is estimated and the second time ES is estimated. We also report the unadjusted effect size to show the effect sizes before any adjustments have been made. More details about these adjustments can be found in our Technical Documentation.

Meta-Analysis of Program Effects
Outcomes measured Primary or secondary participant No. of effect sizes Treatment N Adjusted effect sizes (ES) and standard errors (SE) used in the benefit-cost analysis Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)
First time ES is estimated Second time ES is estimated
ES SE Age ES SE Age ES p-value
High school graduation Primary 1 79 -0.018 0.189 22 -0.018 0.189 22 -0.018 0.926
Repeat teen birth^ Primary 1 77 0.089 0.215 22 0.089 0.215 22 0.089 0.678
Child abuse and neglect Secondary 1 149 -0.378 0.537 3 -0.378 0.537 13 -0.378 0.482
Test scores Secondary 5 625 0.086 0.084 4 0.018 0.092 17 0.086 0.302
Citations Used in the Meta-Analysis

Drotar, D., Robinson, J., Jeavons, L., & Kirchner, H. L. (2009). A randomized, controlled evaluation of early intervention: The Born to Learn curriculum. Child Care, Health & Development, 35(5), 643-649.

Pfannenstiel, J.C., & Seltzer, D.A. (1989). New parents as teachers: Evaluation of an early parent education program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4(1), 1-18.

Wagner, M.M., & Clayton, S.L. (1999). The Parents as Teachers program: Results from two demonstrations. The Future of Children, 9(1), 91-115.

Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Gerlach-Downie, S. (1996). Intervention in support of adolescent parents and their children: A final report on the Teen Parents as Teachers Demonstration. Menlo Park, CA. SRI International.

Wagner, M., Spiker, D. (with Hernandez, F., Song, J., & Gerlach-Downie, S.). (2001). Multisite Parents as Teachers evaluation: Experiences and outcomes for children and families (SRI Project P07283). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

For more information on the methods
used please see our Technical Documentation.
360.664.9800
institute@wsipp.wa.gov