|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$1,521||Benefits minus costs||$4,277|
|Participants||$3,157||Benefit to cost ratio||$4.67|
|Others||$1,324||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($559)||benefits greater than the costs||86 %|
|Net program cost||($1,166)|
|Benefits minus cost||$4,277|
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Benefits from changes to:1||Benefits to:|
|Labor market earnings associated with test scores||$1,470||$3,238||$1,438||$0||$6,147|
|Health care associated with educational attainment||$89||($24)||($97)||$44||$12|
|Costs of higher education||($38)||($57)||($17)||($19)||($131)|
|Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($585)||($585)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$1,132||2013||Present value of net program costs (in 2016 dollars)||($1,166)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2013||Cost range (+ or -)||10 %|
|Estimated Cumulative Net Benefits Over Time (Non-Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in non-discounted dollars to simplify the “break-even” point from a budgeting perspective. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes (ES) and standard errors (SE) used in the benefit-cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Borman, G.D., & Dowling, N. (2006). Longitudinal achievement effects of multiyear summer school: Evidence from the Teach Baltimore randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 28(1), 25-48.
Borman, G.D., Goetz, M. E., & Dowling, N.M. (2009). Halting the summer achievement slide: A randomized field trial of the KindergARTen summer camp. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14(2), 133-147.
Chaplin, D., & Capizzano, J. (2006). Impacts of a summer learning program: A random assignment study of Building Educated Leaders for Life (BELL). Washington DC: Urban Institute.
Geis, R. (1968). A preventive summer program for kindergarten children likely to fail in first grade reading, Final Report. La Canada, CA: La Canada Unified School District.
Jacob, B.A., & Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226-244.
Mariano, L.T., & Martorell, P. (2013). The academic effects of summer instruction and retention in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 96-117.
Matsudaira, J.D. (2008). Mandatory summer school and student achievement. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 829-850.
Opalinski, G.B. (2006). The effects of a middle school summer school program on the achievement of NCLB identified subgroups (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 2006, UMI No. 3224110).
Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2005). Learning when school is not in session: A reading summer day-camp intervention to improve the achievement of exiting first-grade students who are economically disadvantaged. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 158-169.
Zvoch, K., & Stevens, J. (2011). Summer school and summer learning: An examination of the short- and longer-term changes in student literacy. Early Education & Development, 22(4), 649-675.
Zvoch, K., & Stevens, J. J. (2013). Summer school effects in a randomized field trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(1), 24-32.