Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Prev
Next
June 2000
This study examines three questions about the Washington State WorkFirst program: Is TANF cost-effective, are WorkFirst clients becoming harder to employ, and does participating in WorkFirst Job Search improve employment outcomes? The analyses support the following conclusions: 1) When compared with AFDC, the government spends more per TANF household. Under TANF, however, fewer clients use welfare, and overall welfare costs are less.  2) According to four specific factors that impact employment, clients on the caseload in February 2000 were no harder to employ than clients on the caseload when WorkFirst began in August 1997.  3) For those with no recent work experience, job search increases employment rates. Results for clients with a recent work history are mixed. WorkFirst replaced AFDC as the state’s welfare program in 1997.
Related:
Search WSIPP reports


Filter By Topic -
Benefit-cost analysis
Children’s services
Criminal justice
Adult corrections

Juvenile justice

Employment/Welfare
General government
Health care
Higher education
Inventories
Mental health
Pre-K-12 education
Prevention
Public health
Substance abuse
Transportation

Filter By Author -
Madeline Barch
Julia Cramer
Adam Darnell
Elizabeth Drake
Danielle Fumia
Rebecca Goodvin
Joshua Grice
Lijian He
Michael Hirsch
Chasya Hoagland
Stephanie Lee
Matt Lemon
Marna Miller
Catherine Nicolai
Eva Westley
(show all authors)

Filter By Date
From:  
To:  
BOARD
STAFF
CONTACT
 
110 FIFTH AVENUE SE, SUITE 214
P O BOX 40999
OLYMPIA, WA 98504
 
360.664.9800
institute@wsipp.wa.gov