ALL |
META-ANALYSIS |
CITATIONS |
|
Meta-Analysis of Program Effects | ||||||||||||
Outcomes measured | No. of effect sizes | Treatment N | Effect sizes (ES) and standard errors (SE) | Unadjusted effect size (random effects model) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES | SE | Age | ES | p-value | ||||||||
Test scores Standardized, validated tests of academic achievement. |
9 | 16665 | 0.053 | 0.011 | 11 | 0.053 | 0.001 |
Angrist, J.D., Dynarski, S.M., Kane, T.J., Pathak, P.A., & Walters, C.R. (2012). Who benefits from KIPP? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/pam.21647.
Ross, S. M., McDonald, A. J., Alberg, M., & McSparrin-Gallagher, B. (2007). Achievement and Climate Outcomes for the Knowledge Is Power Program in an Inner-City Middle School. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(2): 137-165.
Tuttle, C.C., Gill, B., Gleason, P., Knechtel, V., Nicholas-Barrer, I., & Resch, A. (2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Washington DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
Woodworth, K.R., David, J.L., Guha, R., Wang, H., & Lopez-Torkos, A. (2008). San Francisco Bay area KIPP schools: A study of early implementation and achievement (Final Report). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.