|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$1,513||Benefits minus costs||$4,343|
|Participants||$3,553||Benefit to cost ratio||$4.54|
|Others||$1,874||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($1,370)||benefits greater than the costs||84 %|
|Net program cost||($1,227)|
|Benefits minus cost||$4,343|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Standardized, validated tests of academic achievement.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Test scores||Labor market earnings associated with test scores||$1,513||$3,553||$1,874||($756)||$6,183|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($613)||($613)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$1,132||2013||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($1,227)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2013||Cost range (+ or -)||10 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Borman, G.D., & Dowling, N. (2006). Longitudinal achievement effects of multiyear summer school: Evidence from the Teach Baltimore randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 28(1), 25-48.
Borman, G.D., Goetz, M. E., & Dowling, N.M. (2009). Halting the summer achievement slide: A randomized field trial of the KindergARTen summer camp. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14(2), 133-147.
Chaplin, D., & Capizzano, J. (2006). Impacts of a summer learning program: A random assignment study of Building Educated Leaders for Life (BELL). Washington DC: Urban Institute.
Geis, R. (1968). A preventive summer program for kindergarten children likely to fail in first grade reading, Final Report. La Canada, CA: La Canada Unified School District.
Jacob, B.A., & Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226-244.
Mariano, L.T., & Martorell, P. (2013). The academic effects of summer instruction and retention in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 96-117.
Matsudaira, J.D. (2008). Mandatory summer school and student achievement. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 829-850.
Opalinski, G.B. (2006). The effects of a middle school summer school program on the achievement of NCLB identified subgroups (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 2006, UMI No. 3224110).
Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2005). Learning when school is not in session: A reading summer day-camp intervention to improve the achievement of exiting first-grade students who are economically disadvantaged. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 158-169.
Zvoch, K., & Stevens, J. (2011). Summer school and summer learning: An examination of the short- and longer-term changes in student literacy. Early Education & Development, 22(4), 649-675.
Zvoch, K., & Stevens, J. J. (2013). Summer school effects in a randomized field trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(1), 24-32.