|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$2,906||Benefits minus costs||$9,804|
|Participants||$0||Benefit to cost ratio||$14.10|
|Others||$6,564||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||$1,083||benefits greater than the costs||99 %|
|Net program cost||($749)|
|Benefits minus cost||$9,804|
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Benefits from changes to:1||Benefits to:|
|Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($375)||($375)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$748||2016||Present value of net program costs (in 2016 dollars)||($749)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2016||Cost range (+ or -)||10 %|
|Estimated Cumulative Net Benefits Over Time (Non-Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in non-discounted dollars to simplify the “break-even” point from a budgeting perspective. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes (ES) and standard errors (SE) used in the benefit-cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Dugan J.R., & Everett, R.S. (1998). An experimental test of chemical dependency therapy for jail inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42(4), 360-368.
Gransky, L.A., & Jones, R.J. (1995). Evaluation of the post-release status of substance abuse program participants. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
Hughey, R., & Klemke, L.W. (1996). Evaluation of a jail-based substance abuse treatment program. Federal Probation, 60(4), 40- 45.
Porporino, F.J., Robinson, D., Millson, B., & Weekes, J.R. (2002). An outcome evaluation of prison-based treatment programming for substance users. Substance Use & Misuse, 37(8-10), 1047-1077.
Proctor, S., Hoffmann, N., & Allison, S. (2012). The effectiveness of interactive journaling in reducing recidivism among substance-dependent jail inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(2), 317-332.
Wexler, H.K., Falkin, G.P., & Lipton, D.S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 71-92.