|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$6,449||Benefits minus costs||$20,601|
|Participants||$0||Benefit to cost ratio||$18.36|
|Others||$12,712||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||$2,627||benefits greater than the costs||100 %|
|Net program cost||($1,187)|
|Benefits minus cost||$20,601|
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Benefits from changes to:1||Benefits to:|
|Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$1||($592)||($591)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$1,102||2010||Present value of net program costs (in 2015 dollars)||($1,187)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2010||Cost range (+ or -)||10 %|
|Estimated Cumulative Net Benefits Over Time (Non-Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in non-discounted dollars to simplify the “break-even” point from a budgeting perspective. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes (ES) and standard errors (SE) used in the benefit-cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Cho, R.M., & Tyler, J.H. (2010). Does prison-based adult basic education improve postrelease outcomes for male prisoners in Florida? Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011128710389588
Harer, M.D. (1995). Prison education program participation and recidivism: A test of the normalization hypothesis. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Research and Evaluation.
Mitchell, O. (2002). Statistical analysis of the three state CEA data. Unpublished manuscript.
Piehl, A.M. (1995). Learning while doing time. Unpublished manuscript, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Sedgley, N.H., Scott, C. E., Williams, N.A., & Derrick, F.W. (2010). Prison's dilemma: Do education and jobs programmes affect recidivism? Economica, 77(307), 497-517.
Smith, L.G. (2005). Pennsylvania Department of Corrections education outcome study. Lanham, MD: Correctional Education Association.
Walsh, A. (1985). An evaluation of the effects of adult basic education on rearrest rates among probationers. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 9(4), 69-76.
Winterfield, L., Coggeshall, M., Burke-Storer, M., Correa, V., & Tidd, S. (2009). The effects of postsecondary correctional education: Final report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.